ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2006
PROVE-IT proved it: lower is better--pro.
Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lipid goal attainment in post-acute coronary syndrome patients in China: Results from the 6-month real-world dyslipidemia international study II.Clinical cardiology · 2021 · on this mapObservational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data from prospective epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials have clearly demonstrated that lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations are associated with the greatest reduction in cardiovascular events. Coronary artery disease mortality is lowest in epidemiological studies in those individuals with the lowest cholesterol concentrations. In angiographic studies, patients who had their cholesterol lowered had less angiographic worsening of their atherosclerosis, with those trials that had the lowest on-treatment LDL-C, and especially those that had the greatest percentage of LDL-C lowering, showed the least progression of atherosclerosis. Clinical trials have also highlighted the fact that lower LDL-C concentrations are associated with reduced risk for both a first and a subsequent coronary event with analyses showing that event rates in both primary and secondary prevention trials are directly proportional to on-treatment LDL-C concentrations. An aggressive approach to LDL-C lowering, especially in the high-risk patient, seems warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.