Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16498490›Full record

ArticlePrimary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry2005

Primary care specialty, resident status, and male gender correlate with controlled drug contract use.

Bryan K Touchet, William R Yates, Ian T Fischer, Kim A Coon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryan K TouchetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine-Tulsa, Tulsa, USA. bryan-touchet@ouhsc.edu
William R Yates
Ian T Fischer
Kim A Coon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith prescription drug abuse rising, physicians are often ambivalent about prescribing controlled drugs. To address their concerns, physicians widely use controlled drug contracts (CDC); however, CDC use is poorly studied. This preliminary study characterizes CDC users and identifies factors associated with CDC use.

methodData were collected from a Web-based survey of University of Oklahoma College of Medicine medical trainee and faculty attitudes and prescribing practices regarding controlled drugs. Recruited via e-mail, participants submitted responses anonymously for a 6-week period from January through March 2004. Associations between demographic variables and participants' responses were analyzed using chi2 analysis to determine correlates of CDC use. Demographic variables included training status (medical student, resident, or faculty), age, gender, and faculty specialty. Variables of interest derived from the survey were CDC use, how respondents compared the risks and benefits of controlled drugs, and patient diagnosis.

resultsOne hundred ninety-six surveys were submitted, with an estimated response rate of 20% to 30%. CDC use correlated with male gender (p = .0099), resident status (p = .0099), primary care specialty among faculty (p = .0001), and risk/benefit assessment (p = .04) but not patient diagnosis (p = .19) or participant age (p = .40).

conclusionsDespite limitations, the study findings suggest that a physician's gender, training status, medical specialty, and comparison of the risks and benefits of controlled drugs are factors that determine CDC use.

Identifiers

PMID16498490
PMCPMC1324959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.