Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16498443›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2006

Vaccines for tumour prevention.

Pier-Luigi Lollini, Federica Cavallo, Patrizia Nanni, Guido Forni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Immunotherapy: The Fourth Domain in Oral Cancer Therapeutics.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Virus-like Particle (VLP) Vaccines for Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review of cancer therapies for the perioperative physician.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pier-Luigi LolliniSection of Cancer Research, Department of Experimental Pathology, University of Bologna, Italy.
Federica Cavallo
Patrizia Nanni
Guido Forni

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite tremendous progress in basic and epidemiological research, effective prevention of most types of cancer is still lacking. Vaccine use in cancer therapy remains a promising but difficult prospect. However, new mouse models that recapitulate significant features of human cancer progression show that vaccines can keep precancerous lesions under control and might eventually be the spearhead of effective and reliable ways to prevent cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesHumansNeoplasmsCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID16498443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.