Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16497871›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2006

c-myc amplifications in primary breast carcinomas and their local recurrences.

S Aulmann, N Adler, J Rom, B Helmchen, P Schirmacher, H P Sinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Importance of Copy Number Alterations ofJournal of medical biochemistry · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. MYC gene amplification is often acquired in lethal distant breast cancer metastases of unamplified primary tumors.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2012
    Article
  19. MYC and metastasis.Cancer research · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S AulmannDepartment of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. sebastian_aulmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de
N Adler
J Rom
B Helmchen
P Schirmacher
H P Sinn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the role of c-myc oncogene amplifications in the progression of invasive breast carcinomas.

methodsc-myc gene copy number was evaluated in a series of 49 primary breast carcinomas and the corresponding local recurrences using fluorescence in situ hybridisation.

results11 of the primary carcinomas (22%) harboured c-myc amplifications; these tumours typically were hormone receptor negative and occurred in younger patients (43 v 53 years). At the time of relapse, six additional tumours had acquired a c-myc amplification. The mean recurrence-free survival was 24 months; c-myc amplified tumours relapsed significantly earlier than carcinomas without amplification (18 v 27 months). Univariate analysis showed a worse overall survival in these patients.

conclusionsWhile c-myc amplifications can be observed in early stage breast cancer, especially in younger patients, they often occur later in tumour development and appear to be associated with disease progression.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationGenes, mycAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleGenes, p53HumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID16497871
PMCPMC1860364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.