Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions: case reports generate signals efficiently.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Importance of Publishing Adverse Drug Reaction Case Reports: Promoting Public Health and Advancing Pharmacology and Therapeutics.Drug safety - case reports · 2017
   Article
2. Completeness of published case reports on suspected adverse drug reactions: evaluation of 100 reports from a company safety database.Drug safety · 2010
   Article
3. Case reports and drug safety.Drug safety · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions--systematic literature survey of follow-up.2006

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as