Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16497584›Full record

ReviewCell2006

Virus entry: open sesame.

Mark Marsh, Ari Helenius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 583 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
583citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

583 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Hydrodynamic dispersion drives viral-cellular contact for gene delivery in porous media.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Serial passagingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

523 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark MarshCell Biology Unit, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. m.marsh@ucl.ac.uk
Ari Helenius

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U122663296Medical Research Council MC_U122665002Medical Research Council U.1226.00.003.00001.01(65002)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed information about the replication cycle of viruses and their interactions with host organisms is required to develop strategies to stop them. Cell biology studies, live-cell imaging, and systems biology have started to illuminate the multiple and subtly different pathways that animal viruses use to enter host cells. These insights are revolutionizing our understanding of endocytosis and the movement of vesicles within cells. In addition, such insights reveal new targets for attacking viruses before they can usurp the host-cell machinery for replication.

Indexed as

EndocytosisVirus AssemblyVirus IntegrationVirus ReplicationAnimalsClathrinGenes, ViralHumansIntracellular MembranesModels, BiologicalProtein TransportReceptors, VirusSignal TransductionVirionClathrinReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID16497584
PMCPMC7112260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.