Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2006
Pharmacokinetics of piritramide in newborns, infants and young children in intensive care units.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opioids: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Neonates, Infants, and Children.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2019Review
- [Piritramide : A critical review].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Review
- [Therapy of perioperative pain in pediatric urology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2009Review
- Clinical practice: analgesia in neonates.European journal of pediatrics · 2009Review
- Prospective evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of piritramide in neonates and infants.European journal of pediatrics · 2008Article
- Population clinical pharmacology of children: general principles.European journal of pediatrics · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piritramide is indicated for treatment of postoperative pain and analgosedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. In an open prospective study the pharmacokinetics of piritramide were investigated in four groups: newborns (NB, age: 1-28 days) (n=8), infants 1 (IF1, age: 2-4 months) (n=7), infants 2 (IF2, age: 5-12 months) (n=14) and young children (YC, age: 2-4 years) (n=10). The recommended paediatric dose range for therapy of postoperative pain is 50-200 microg/kg. Piritramide was administered intravenously as a single dose by bolus injection of 50 microg/kg. Blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 45, 90 min and 3, 6, 9, 12 h after application, and urine samples were collected before application and during the following intervals: 1-2, 2-6, 6-12 h. Piritramide was measured in blood and urine by HPLC-ESI-MS. The following pharmacokinetic parameters: maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), distribution half-life (t 1/2 alpha), elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta), total clearance (Cl(t)) and median volume of distribution at equilibrium (Vd(ss)) were calculated using a non-compartment and a two-compartment model for the disposition of piritramide (TOPFIT and NONMEM-pharmacokinetic analysis). Newborns (NB) showed the highest maximum plasma concentrations (median+/-SD) C(max) (79+/-240 microg/l) compared to the other three groups (IF1 36+/-367, IF2 12+/-81 and YC 16+/-9 microg/l) without statistical significance. The median elimination half-lives (t 1/2 beta) were 702+/-720 min in NB, 157+/-102 min in IF1, 160+/-68 min in IF2 and 166+/-143 min in YC. For t 1/2 beta the difference between NB and the other three groups (IF1, IF2 and YC) was statistically significant (Mann-Whitney-U, P<0.05). Cl(t) was 15.9+/-16.7, 46.6+/-76.9, 235.5+/-454.1 and 338+/-168.1 ml/min in NB, IF1, IF2 and YC respectively. The total clearance increased exponentially with an elimination half-life of 702 min from 15.9 ml/min in NB to 46.6 ml/min in IF2. Differences between the NB/IF1 groups and IF2/YC groups were significantly significant (NB vs. IF2, NB vs. YC, IF1 vs. IF2 and IF1 vs. YC). Vd(ss) was 2.0+/-4.93, 1.7+/-2.5, 7.0+/-5.2 and 6.7+/-2.2 l/kg in NB, IF1, IF2 and YC respectively. In comparison to group IF1 the Vd(ss) was significantly larger in groups IF2 and YC (Mann-Whitney U, P<0.05). Newborns showed a high initial concentration and a distinct prolongation of the elimination half-life of piritramide compared to infants, young children and adults. Therefore, dosage needed to treat postoperative pain should be reduced, and the repetitive doses should be geared to the analgesic effects. In infants and young children the elimination of piritramide is increased compared to adults; therefore the duration of the effects of piritramide will be shortened, and dose intervals ought to be reduced. Subsequent clinical trials for detailed dose adjustment of piritramide in paediatric patients comparing pharmacokinetics and effectiveness are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.