Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16495448›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Synaptic bombardment modulates muscarinic effects in forelimb motor cortex.

Niraj S Desai, Elisabeth C Walcott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Focusing effect of acetylcholine on neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Activity Clamp Provides Insights into Paradoxical Effects of the Anti-Seizure Drug Carbamazepine.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  4. Monoaminergic Modulation of Motor Cortex Function.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synaptic and intrinsic balancing during postnatal development in rat pups exposed to valproic acid in utero.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  10. Dynamic clamp with StdpC software.Nature protocols · 2011
    Article
  11. Pyramidal neuron conductance state gates spike-timing-dependent plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cholinergic filtering in the recurrent excitatory microcircuit of cortical layer 4.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niraj S DesaiThe Neurosciences Institute, San Diego, California 92121, USA. desai@nsi.edu
Elisabeth C Walcott
Neurosciences Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neocortical neurons in vivo exist in an environment of continuous synaptic bombardment, receiving a complex barrage of excitatory and inhibitory inputs. This background activity (by depolarizing neurons, increasing membrane conductance, and introducing fluctuations) strongly alters many aspects of neuronal responsiveness. In this study, we asked how it shapes neuromodulation of postsynaptic responses. Specifically, we examined muscarinic modulation of forelimb motor cortex, a brain area in which cholinergic stimulation is known to be necessary for modifications during motor skill learning. Using a dynamic clamp system to inject simulated conductances into pyramidal neurons in motor cortical slices, we mimicked in vivo-like activity by introducing a random background of excitatory and inhibitory inputs. When muscarinic receptors were stimulated with the agonist oxotremorine-M, several previously described currents were modified, and excitability was increased. However, the presence of the background conductances strongly attenuated most muscarinic agonist effects, with the notable exception that sustained firing responses to trains of inputs were well preserved. This may be important for promoting plasticity in vivo.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCells, CulturedEvoked Potentials, MotorForelimbMotor ActivityMotor CortexRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, MuscarinicSynaptic TransmissionReceptors, Muscarinic

Identifiers

PMID16495448
PMCPMC6674814
OpenAlexW2090366187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.