Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16495358›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2006

Nonlinear information processing in a model sensory system.

Maurice J Chacron

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nonresponsive Neurons Improve Population Coding of Object Location.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stimulator compensation and generation of Gaussian noise stimuli with defined amplitude spectra for studying input-output relations of sensory systems.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel Functions of Feedback in Electrosensory Processing.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Synchronous spikes are necessary but not sufficient for a synchrony code in populations of spiking neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Optimized Parallel Coding of Second-Order Stimulus Features by Heterogeneous Neural Populations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maurice J ChacronDepartment of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, 730 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA. mauricejchacron@yahoo.ca

Funding

CIHR 82838-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms by which sensory neurons encode and decode information remains an important goal in neuroscience. We quantified the performance of optimal linear and nonlinear encoding models in a well-characterized sensory system: the electric sense of weakly electric fish. We show that linear encoding models generally perform better under spatially localized stimulation than under spatially diffuse stimulation. Through pharmacological blockade of feedback input and spatial saturation of the receptive field center, we show that there is significantly less synaptic noise under spatially diffuse stimuli as compared with spatially localized stimuli. Modeling results suggest that pyramidal cells nonlinearly encode sensory information through shunting in their dendrites and clarify the influence of synaptic noise on the performance of linear encoding models. Finally, we used information theory to quantify the performance of linear decoders. While the optimal linear decoder for spatially localized stimuli could capture 60% of the information in pyramidal cell spike trains, the optimal linear decoder for spatially diffuse stimuli could only capture 40% of the information. These results show that nonlinear decoders are necessary to fully access information in pyramidal cell spike trains, and we discuss potential mechanisms by which higher-order neurons could decode this information.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingModels, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsAction PotentialsAnimalsElectric FishNeurons, AfferentTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16495358
PMCPMC5053817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.