Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16493692›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists2006

Migrating anterior mesoderm cells and intercalating trunk mesoderm cells have distinct responses to Rho and Rac during Xenopus gastrulation.

Ruiyi Ren, Martina Nagel, Emilios Tahinci, Rudi Winklbauer, Karen Symes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. YAP/TAZ Related BioMechano Signal Transduction and Cancer Metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bves directly interacts with GEFT, and controls cell shape and movement through regulation of Rac1/Cdc42 activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruiyi RenDepartment of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Martina Nagel
Emilios Tahinci
Rudi Winklbauer
Karen Symes
Boston University · USUniversity of Toronto · CAVanderbilt University · US

Funding

CELL MOVEMENT DURING XENOPUS DEVELOPMENT--METASTASISR01CA087375 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SYMES, KAREN · 2000 to 2004
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087375NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 87375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rho GTPases have been shown recently to be important for cell polarity and motility of the trunk mesoderm during gastrulation in Xenopus embryos. This work demonstrated that Rho and Rac have both distinct and overlapping roles in regulating cell shape, and the dynamic properties, polarity, and type of protrusive activity of these cells. Overexpression of activated or inhibitory versions of these GTPases also disrupts development of the head in Xenopus embryos. In this study, we have undertaken a detailed analysis of Rho and Rac function in migrating anterior mesendoderm cells. Scanning electron micrographs of these cells in situ revealed that their normal shingle arrangement is disrupted and both the cells and their lamellipodia are disoriented. Anterior mesendoderm explants plated on their natural blastocoel roof matrix, however, still migrated towards the animal pole, although the tendency to move in this direction is reduced compared to controls. Analysis of a number of parameters in time-lapse recordings of dissociated cells indicated that Rho and Rac also have both distinct and overlapping roles in the motility of the prospective head mesoderm; however, their effects differ to those previously seen in the trunk mesoderm. Both GTPases appear to modulate cell polarization, migration, and protrusive activity. Rho alone, however, regulates the retraction of the lagging edge of the cell. We propose that within the gastrulating Xenopus embryo, two types of mesoderm cells that undergo different motilities have distinct responses to Rho GTPases.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsCell PolarityCell SizeEmbryo, NonmammalianGastrulaMesodermMicroinjectionsMicroscopy, Videorac GTP-Binding Proteinsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerXenopusrac GTP-Binding Proteinsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID16493692
PMCPMC2564620
OpenAlexW2140715727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.