ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology : journal of the Tissue Culture Association1991
Phenotype alteration in colon carcinoma cells: effect of in vivo passage?
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology : journal of the Tissue Culture Association, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A panel of rat colon adenocarcinoma cell lines (the Per series) were used to investigate the phenotype and karyotype changes induced by in vivo passage in the subcutis of athymic nude mice. One poorly and one well-differentiated tumor cell line were serially passaged through the athymic nude mouse and then back to the syngeneic rat host. Each of the primary and xenograft cell lines expressed fetal crypt cell ("CaCo") antigens. The well differentiated primary and xenograft lines (Per305, Per305N1, and Per305N2a) were different in each of their growth factor responsiveness in vitro [i.e. epidermal growth factor (EGF), bombesin, vasoactive intestinal peptide], their EGF receptor expression, their secretion of transforming growth factor-alpha, and their exhibition of anchorage independent (A-I) growth capabilities. The poorly differentiated primary and xenograft cell lines were also different but were all capable of A-I growth; their responsiveness to exogenous growth factor stimulation decreased with progressive in vivo passage, as did their basal unstimulated proliferation rate. Cytogenetic alterations detected were those associated with clinical specimens from various stages of malignancy, i. e. aneuploidy, structural aberrations, and marker chromosomes. Genetic and mitogenic individuality of each line demonstrated the diversity of the growth control mechanisms in neoplasms at different stages of progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.