Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16491321›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2006

Maintenance of muscle strength may counteract weight-loss-related postmenopausal bone loss--a population-based approach.

J Sirola, T Rikkonen, M Tuppurainen, R Honkanen, J S Jurvelin, H Kröger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effects of weight loss approaches on bone mineral density in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J SirolaBone and Cartilage Research Unit (BCRU), University of Kuopio, Mediteknia Building, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland. joonas.sirola@uku.fi
T Rikkonen
M Tuppurainen
R Honkanen
J S Jurvelin
H Kröger
University of Eastern Finland · FIKuopio University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWeight loss significantly increases postmenopausal bone loss, but the effects of muscle strength change on weight-loss-associated bone loss remain unclear. The study population, 587 peri- and postmenopausal women, was a random sample of the original Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE) study cohort (n=14,220) in Kuopio, Finland. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) was measured with dual x-ray absorptiometry, and grip strength was measured with a pneumatic squeeze dynamometer at baseline in 1989-1991 and at the 10-year follow-up in 1999-2001.

methodsWomen were divided into three groups according to change in age-grouped grip-strength quartile in both of the measurements: "decreased" (n=133), "maintained" (n=300), and "improved" (n=154). In addition, the study sample was divided into two groups according to weight change during the follow-up: weight losers (n=156) and weight gainers (n=431).

resultsThere were no differences in the change status of grip (muscle) strength between the weight loss and weight gain groups (p>0.500, Pearson chi-square test). Women losing weight during the follow-up and within the improved grip-strength-change group had a significantly lower bone loss rate compared with those in the maintained and decreased grip-strength-change groups (p<0.01 in comparison to the decreased group). This was in contrast to women who gained weight during the follow-up (not significant between any grip-strength-change groups). Furthermore, women who lost body weight and were in the improved grip-strength-change group had a bone loss rate comparable with that of the women who gained body weight (not significant). This was in contrast to the maintained (p<0.05 between weight losers versus gainers in LS) and decreased grip-strength-change groups (p<0.01 weight losers versus gainers in LS and FN).

conclusionThe present study suggests that maintaining muscle strength may counteract postmenopausal bone loss related to weight loss. Accordingly, exercise that improves muscle strength may be encouraged for postmenopausal women with weight loss intentions for other health reasons.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonFemaleFemur NeckFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHand StrengthHumansLumbar VertebraeMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalProspective StudiesWeight GainWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID16491321
OpenAlexW2122374601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.