Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16489444›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2006

[Recurrent urinary tract infection in women. Long-term antibiotic prophylaxis].

M Ludwig, U Hoyme, W Weidner

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Urinary tract infections in women: etiology and treatment options.International journal of general medicine · 2011
    Article
  5. FMC : Formacion medica continuada en atencion primaria · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M LudwigUrologische Praxis Dres. A. von Keitz, M. Schwickardi, M. Ludwig, Marburg. dr.martin.ludwig@t-online.de
U Hoyme
W Weidner
Helios Klinikum Erfurt · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Andrologie · DEPraxis · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are among the most frequent bacterial infections in women. Mostly young women and, to some extent, postmenopausal women are affected by recurrent UTI (rUTI), defined as >or=3 UTI/year. Modifiable predisposing factors are rare. The differential diagnosis between relapse and reinfection is decisive for therapy. Antibiotic prophylaxis has emerged as one of the most important therapeutic principles in rUTI. Depending on the drug utilized, the various modes of action are described as reducing the number of uropathogens in the gut and vaginal flora and/or in repeatedly eliminating bacteria from the urine. According to the European Association of Urology guidelines, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim, and cotrimoxazole are available as first-line drugs. Cephalexin and the quinolones should be restricted to specific indications. Depending on the case, long-term antibiotic prophylaxis for 6 months, postcoital single dose prophylaxis, or patient-initiated self-start therapy can all be used successfully. Given the correct indications, the recurrence rate of rUTI can be reduced by 95%.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, UrinaryBacterial InfectionsBacteriuriaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSecondary PreventionUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Infective Agents, Urinary

Identifiers

PMID16489444
OpenAlexW177710267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.