ReviewIntensive care medicine2006
Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2005. III. Nutrition, pediatric and neonatal critical care, and experimental.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of non-invasive NIRS during a vascular occlusion test to assess dynamic tissue O(2) saturation response.Intensive care medicine · 2008Trial
- Pediatric intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: a new challenge for the pediatric intensivist.Intensive care medicine · 2008Review
- High-frequency oscillatory ventilation reduces lung inflammation: a large-animal 24-h model of respiratory distress.Intensive care medicine · 2007Article
- Pulmonary bacterial co-infection in children ventilated for severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis is common.Intensive care medicine · 2007Article
- A short goodbye...Intensive care medicine · 2007Article
- Workplace NO and NO2 during combined treatment of infants with nasal CPAP and NO.Intensive care medicine · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16489423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.