Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16489371›Full record

ReviewNeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2005

Developing therapeutics for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

David J Virley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Dental Amalgam Fillings and Multiple Sclerosis: A Nationwide Population-Based Case-Control Study in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David J VirleyNeurology and GI Centre of Excellence for Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, United Kingdom. David_J_Virley@gsk.com
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is both a complex and chronic neurological disease of the CNS. This poses unique challenges for drug discovery in terms of delineating specific targets related to disease mechanisms and developing safe and effective molecules for clinical application. Preclinical animal models of MS provide the necessary test bed for evaluating the effects of novel therapeutic strategies. Because the clinical manifestations and pathological consequences of disease vary dramatically from individual to individual, as well as treatment response to existing therapies, this creates a significant research endeavor in terms of translating preclinical methodologies to the clinical domain. Potentially exciting treatments have emerged in the form of natalizumab (Tysabri), an alpha4 integrin antagonist, and more recently FTY720, a sphinogosine-1 phosphate receptor modulator, providing a compelling proof-of-principle from bench to bedside. However, further research is required to discharge safety concerns associated with these therapeutic avenues. Future prospects in the guise of disease-modifying therapies that target the inflammatory and neurodegenerative components of disease have come to the forefront of preclinical research with the sole aim of reducing the underlying irreversible progressive disability of MS. Significant progress with novel therapies will be made by implementing biomarker strategies that extrapolate robustly from animal models to the divergent patient populations of MS. The future therapeutic options for MS will depend on improvements in understanding the precise factors involved in disease onset and progression and subsequently the development of oral therapeutics that translate sustained benefit from the preclinical context into clinical reality.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMultiple SclerosisImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID16489371
PMCPMC1201321
OpenAlexW1964540675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.