Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16489335›Full record

ArticleNature methods2006

A pooling-deconvolution strategy for biological network elucidation.

Fulai Jin, Tony Hazbun, Gregory A Michaud, Michael Salcius, Paul F Predki, Stanley Fields, Jing Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Compressed Genotyping.IEEE transactions on information theory · 2010
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fulai JinDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, and the Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Tony Hazbun
Gregory A Michaud
Michael Salcius
Paul F Predki
Stanley Fields
Jing Huang

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
A Mixed-Bait-Strategy for Protein Interactome MappingR21HG003729 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HUANG, JING · 2006 to 2007
$280k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR11823NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG003729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of large-scale data sets is a fundamental requirement of systems biology. But despite recent advances, generation of such high-coverage data remains a major challenge. We developed a pooling-deconvolution strategy that can dramatically decrease the effort required. This strategy, pooling with imaginary tags followed by deconvolution (PI-deconvolution), allows the screening of 2(n) probe proteins (baits) in 2 x n pools, with n replicates for each bait. Deconvolution of baits with their binding partners (preys) can be achieved by reading the prey's profile from the 2 x n experiments. We validated this strategy for protein-protein interaction mapping using both proteome microarrays and a yeast two-hybrid array, demonstrating that PI-deconvolution can be used to identify interactions accurately with fewer experiments and better coverage. We also show that PI-deconvolution can be used to identify protein-small molecule interactions inferred from profiling the yeast deletion collection. PI-deconvolution should be applicable to a wide range of library-against-library approaches and can also be used to optimize array designs.

Indexed as

Systems BiologyTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesComputational BiologyDrug ResistanceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProtein Array AnalysisProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityProteins

Identifiers

PMID16489335
PMCPMC2803036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.