Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16488895›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006

Treatment of low back pain by acupressure and physical therapy: randomised controlled trial.

Lisa Li-Chen Hsieh, Chung-Hung Kuo, Liang Huei Lee, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Kuo-Liong Chien, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
36.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Massage and Performance Recovery: A Meta-Analytical Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Massage for low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Low back pain (chronic).BMJ clinical evidence · 2008
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2014
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. The efficacy of acupressure at the Sanyinjiao point in the improvement of women's general health.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2011
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa Li-Chen HsiehInstitute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung-Hung Kuo
Liang Huei Lee
Amy Ming-Fang Yen
Kuo-Liong Chien
Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
National Taiwan University · TWKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWSumitomo Dainippon Pharma (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of acupressure in terms of disability, pain scores, and functional status.

designRandomised controlled trial.

settingOrthopaedic clinic in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

participants129 patients with chronic low back pain.

interventionAcupressure or physical therapy for one month.

main outcome measuresSelf administered Chinese versions of standard outcome measures for low back pain (primary outcome: Roland and Morris disability questionnaire) at baseline, after treatment, and at six month follow-up.

resultsThe mean total Roland and Morris disability questionnaire score after treatment was significantly lower in the acupressure group than in the physical therapy group regardless of the difference in absolute score (- 3.8, 95% confidence interval - 5.7 to - 1.9) or mean change from the baseline (- 4.64, - 6.39 to - 2.89). Acupressure conferred an 89% (95% confidence interval 61% to 97%) reduction in significant disability compared with physical therapy. The improvement in disability score in the acupressure group compared with the physical group remained at six month follow-up. Statistically significant differences also occurred between the two groups for all six domains of the core outcome, pain visual scale, and modified Oswestry disability questionnaire after treatment and at six month follow-up.

conclusionsAcupressure was effective in reducing low back pain in terms of disability, pain scores, and functional status. The benefit was sustained for six months.

Indexed as

AcupressureAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesHumansLow Back PainMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPersons with DisabilitiesPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID16488895
PMCPMC1410852
OpenAlexW2007770480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.