Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16485473›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2005

Porcine noroviruses related to human noroviruses.

Qiu-Hong Wang, Myung Guk Han, Sonia Cheetham, Menira Souza, Julie A Funk, Linda J Saif

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Zoonotic and reverse zoonotic transmission of viruses between humans and pigs.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiu-Hong WangFood Animal Health Research Program, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA.
Myung Guk Han
Sonia Cheetham
Menira Souza
Julie A Funk
Linda J Saif
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

PATHOGENESIS- HUMAN CALICIVIRUSES IN GNOTOBIOTIC ANIMALSR01AI049742 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAIF, LINDA J. · 2000 to 2003
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049742NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI 49742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of genogroup II (GII) norovirus (NoV) RNA from adult pigs in Japan and Europe and GII NoV antibodies in US swine raises public health concerns about zoonotic transmission of porcine NoVs to humans, although no NoVs have been detected in US swine. To detect porcine NoVs and to investigate their genetic diversity and relatedness to human NoVs, 275 fecal samples from normal US adult swine were screened by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with calicivirus universal primers. Six samples were positive for NoV. Based on sequence analysis of 3 kb on the 3' end of 5 porcine NoVs, 3 genotypes in GII and a potential recombinant were identified. One genotype of porcine NoVs was genetically and antigenically related to human NoVs and replicated in gnotobiotic pigs. These results raise concerns of whether subclinically infected adult swine may be reservoirs of new human NoVs or if porcine/human GII recombinants could emerge.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsCapsid ProteinsFecesGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansNorovirusRecombination, GeneticSwineCapsid Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16485473
PMCPMC3367634
OpenAlexW2111517065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.