Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16485037›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2006

Structure modeling of all identified G protein-coupled receptors in the human genome.

Yang Zhang, Mark E Devries, Jeffrey Skolnick

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. GPCR Heterodimers: Implications for Biased Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pharmaceutical science advances · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cholesterol in GPCR Structures: Prevalence and Relevance.The Journal of membrane biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang ZhangCenter of Excellence in Bioinformatics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Mark E Devries
Jeffrey Skolnick
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Interaction Pattern Based Predictor of Protein StruturesR01GM048835 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1994 to 2015
$4.0M
THEORY OF FOLDING TRANSITIONS IN A-HELICAL PROTEINSR01GM037408 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1987 to 2014
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-37408NIGMS NIH HHS GM-48835NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037408NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), encoded by about 5% of human genes, comprise the largest family of integral membrane proteins and act as cell surface receptors responsible for the transduction of endogenous signal into a cellular response. Although tertiary structural information is crucial for function annotation and drug design, there are few experimentally determined GPCR structures. To address this issue, we employ the recently developed threading assembly refinement (TASSER) method to generate structure predictions for all 907 putative GPCRs in the human genome. Unlike traditional homology modeling approaches, TASSER modeling does not require solved homologous template structures; moreover, it often refines the structures closer to native. These features are essential for the comprehensive modeling of all human GPCRs when close homologous templates are absent. Based on a benchmarked confidence score, approximately 820 predicted models should have the correct folds. The majority of GPCR models share the characteristic seven-transmembrane helix topology, but 45 ORFs are predicted to have different structures. This is due to GPCR fragments that are predominantly from extracellular or intracellular domains as well as database annotation errors. Our preliminary validation includes the automated modeling of bovine rhodopsin, the only solved GPCR in the Protein Data Bank. With homologous templates excluded, the final model built by TASSER has a global C(alpha) root-mean-squared deviation from native of 4.6 angstroms, with a root-mean-squared deviation in the transmembrane helix region of 2.1 angstroms. Models of several representative GPCRs are compared with mutagenesis and affinity labeling data, and consistent agreement is demonstrated. Structure clustering of the predicted models shows that GPCRs with similar structures tend to belong to a similar functional class even when their sequences are diverse. These results demonstrate the usefulness and robustness of the in silico models for GPCR functional analysis. All predicted GPCR models are freely available for noncommercial users on our Web site (http://www.bioinformatics.buffalo.edu/GPCR).

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAlgorithmsAnimalsCattleCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansInternetModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationProtein ConformationReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSoftwareReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID16485037
PMCPMC1364505
OpenAlexW2120903461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.