Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16484695›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2006

Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample.

Sining Chen, Edwin S Iversen, Tara Friebel, Dianne Finkelstein, Barbara L Weber, Andrea Eisen, Leif E Peterson, Joellen M Schildkraut, Claudine Isaacs, Beth N Peshkin and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2007
    Pooled it
  5. Use of CA125 and HE4 serum markers to predict ovarian cancer in elevated-risk women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. [Fertility management in breast cancer patients: current strategies and research advances].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Breast cancer risk associated withCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Age-specific breast and ovarian cancer risks associated with germlineThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of Cancer · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sining ChenDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. sichen@jhsph.edu
Edwin S Iversen
Tara Friebel
Dianne Finkelstein
Barbara L Weber
Andrea Eisen
Leif E Peterson
Joellen M Schildkraut
Claudine Isaacs
Beth N Peshkin
Camille Corio
Leoni Leondaridis
Gail Tomlinson
Debra Dutson
Rich Kerber
Christopher I Amos
Louise C Strong
Donald A Berry
David M Euhus
Giovanni Parmigiani
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LENNON, ANNE MARIE · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
VACCINES--A NEW PARADIGM FOR BREAST CANCERP50CA088843 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, NANCY ELLEN · 2000 to 2010
$27.8M
COORDINATING CENTER FOR THE CANCER GENETICS NETWORKU01CA078284 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FINKELSTEIN, DIANNE M · 1998 to 2006
$6.0M
CANCER GENETICS NETWORKU24CA078146 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ISAACS, CLAUDINE · 1998 to 2006
$2.8M
Statistical Methods for Cancer GenesR01CA105090 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PARMIGIANI, GIOVANNI · 2004 to 2007
$997k
Mechanisms of 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced hypotensionF30HL099024 · NHLBI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, ROBERT PATRICK · 2010 to 2013
$137k
NCI NIH HHS 5P30 CA06973-39NCI NIH HHS CA78146-01NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30-CA-51008NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NCI NIH HHS P50 CA088843NCI NIH HHS P50CA62924-05NCI NIH HHS P50CA88843NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105090NCI NIH HHS R01CA105090NCI NIH HHS U01 CA078284NCI NIH HHS U24 CA078146NHLBI NIH HHS HL 99-024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn accurate evaluation of the penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is essential to the identification and clinical management of families at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Existing studies have focused on Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) or on families from outside the United States. In this article, we consider the US population using the largest US-based cohort to date of both AJ and non-AJ families.

methodsWe collected 676 AJ families and 1,272 families of other ethnicities through the Cancer Genetics Network. Two hundred eighty-two AJ families were population based, whereas the remainder was collected through counseling clinics. We used a retrospective likelihood approach to correct for bias induced by oversampling of participants with a positive family history. Our approach takes full advantage of detailed family history information and the Mendelian transmission of mutated alleles in the family.

resultsIn the US population, the estimated cumulative breast cancer risk at age 70 years was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.54) in BRCA1 carriers and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.51) in BRCA2 carriers, whereas ovarian cancer risk was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50) in BRCA1 carriers and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.32) in BRCA2 carriers. We also reported the prospective risks of developing cancer for cancer-free carriers in 10-year age intervals. We noted a rapid decrease in the relative risk of breast cancer with age and derived its implication for genetic counseling.

conclusionThe penetrance of BRCA mutations in the United States is largely consistent with previous studies on Western populations given the large CIs on existing estimates. However, the absolute cumulative risks are on the lower end of the spectrum.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic CounselingMutationPenetranceAdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenotypeHeterozygoteHumans

Identifiers

PMID16484695
PMCPMC2323978
OpenAlexW2104505744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.