ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 583 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Simplified Cardiovascular Management Study: A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effects of a Simplified Cardiovascular Management Program in Tibet, China and Haryana, India
Comparison of Two Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain - A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Improving Postoperative Debriefings: the Added Value of Operating Room Black Box Supported Debriefings and Their Effect on Healthcare Professionals Perceived Effectiveness and Psychological Safety.
Effects of Dance-based Multimodal Exercise Programme for Managing Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
583 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Supporting translation of research evidence into practice-the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2023Pooled it
- What do we want to get out of this? a critical interpretive synthesis of the value of process evaluations, with a practical planning framework.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Pooled it
- Nursing interventions to cover patients' basic needs in the intensive care context - A systematic review.Nursing open · 2022Pooled it
- The design, implementation, and effectiveness of intervention strategies aimed at improving genetic referral practices: a systematic review of the literature.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Job Loss Prevention Interventions for Persons with Inflammatory Arthritis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2021Pooled it
- Analysis of Movement-Based Mind-Body Interventions to Guide the Implementation of Osteoarthritis Exercise Programs: A Descriptive Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions to support the mental health of informal caregivers of persons living with dementia - a systematic literature review.BMC geriatrics · 2021Pooled it
- How Sexuality Education Programs Have Been Evaluated in Low-and Lower-Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Lifestyle Modification Interventions to Prevent and Manage Child and Adolescent Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing low-value nursing procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Practitioner perspectives on implementing a quality improvement intervention for telephone-based therapy in NHS Talking Therapies: a qualitative process evaluation study.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- A community-based rehabilitation package following hip fracture: FEMuR III a multi-centre RCT, economic and process evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Trial
- A quantitative process evaluation of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a co-designed cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for people with type 1 diabetes and disordered eating (steady trial): Auditing treatment integrity and delivery.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Trial
- Collaborative model of care between orthopaedics and allied health professionals in knee osteoarthritis (CONNACT): process evaluation of an effectiveness-implementation hybrid randomized control trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Process Evaluation of Individual Placement and Support and Participatory Workplace Intervention to Increase the Sustainable Work Participation of People with Work Disabilities.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- A mixed methods process evaluation of the implementation of a peer coaching intervention to improve the execution of preventive tasks by occupational physicians.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Implementing a workplace participatory approach to support working caregivers in balancing their work, private life and informal care: results of a process evaluation.BMC public health · 2025Trial
523 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.