Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16482094›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2006

Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space.

Boris N Kholodenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 564 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
564citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

564 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Protein-Ratio Rheostats: Integrating Stoichiometry, Abundance, and Binding Affinity in Cellular Function.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Proteinoid Computing on Olivine Substrates.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

504 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Boris N KholodenkoDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA. Boris.Kholodenko@jefferson.edu

Funding

Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling NetworksR01GM059570 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI HOEK, JOANNES B · 2000 to 2010
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specificity of cellular responses to receptor stimulation is encoded by the spatial and temporal dynamics of downstream signalling networks. Temporal dynamics are coupled to spatial gradients of signalling activities, which guide pivotal intracellular processes and tightly regulate signal propagation across a cell. Computational models provide insights into the complex relationships between the stimuli and the cellular responses, and reveal the mechanisms that are responsible for signal amplification, noise reduction and generation of discontinuous bistable dynamics or oscillations.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsHumansKineticsModels, BiologicalReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID16482094
PMCPMC1679905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.