ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2006
Evaluation of dietary fibre intake from infancy to adolescence against various references--results of the DONALD Study.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermal processing optimization and modeling for nutritional quality retention in anchote (Coccinia abyssinica) tuber flour.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intake and sources of dietary fibre and dietary fibre fractions in Finnish children.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Health relevance of lowering postprandial glycaemia in the paediatric population through diet': results from a multistakeholder workshop.European journal of nutrition · 2023Review
- Dietary fiber and growth, iron status and bowel function in children 0-5 years old: a systematic review.Food & nutrition research · 2023Review
- Dietary Fibre Intake in Australia. Paper I: Associations with Demographic, Socio-Economic, and Anthropometric Factors.Nutrients · 2018Article
- Dietary intake of soluble fiber and risk of islet autoimmunity by 5 y of age: results from the TEDDY study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2015Article
- Spinal pain and nutrition in adolescents--an exploratory cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2010Article
- Optimal dietary approaches for prevention of type 2 diabetes: a life-course perspective.Diabetologia · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate dietary fibre intake from infancy to adolescence against various reference standards expressed on a body weight, age or energy intake (EI) basis and to describe age and 15-year time trends. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: The ongoing longitudinal (open cohort) Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study with a total of 7810 3-day dietary records from 980 infants, children and adolescents aged 6 months to 18 years collected between 1990 and 2004.
resultsAbsolute dietary fibre intakes (g/day) increased with age from infancy to adolescence; dietary fibre density (g/1000 kcal) reached a maximum at 1 year and remained constant after the transition to the family diet. Expressed as g/kg body weight, dietary fibre intake increased during infancy with a maximum at 1 year, but decreased thereafter during childhood and adolescence. Dietary fibre intake was low irrespective of the reference used and showed no time trends, with the exception of a small negative trend in 4-8-year olds and 9-13-year-old girls.
conclusionAs intake of dietary fibre in our sample was significantly associated with EI and fibre density remained constant after infancy, our data support an energy-based approach for establishing a reference value for children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16482077What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.