Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16481435›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

The subfornical organ: a central target for circulating feeding signals.

Katherine J Pulman, W Mark Fry, G Trevor Cottrell, Alastair V Ferguson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Autoimmunity Related to Adipsic Hypernatremia and ROHHAD Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Central regulation of body fluid homeostasis.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Anatomical Organization of the Rat Subfornical Organ.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Characteristic clinical features of adipsic hypernatremia patients with subfornical organ-targeting antibody.Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine J PulmanDepartment of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
W Mark Fry
G Trevor Cottrell
Alastair V Ferguson
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms through which circulating ghrelin relays hunger signals to the CNS are not yet fully understood. In this study, we have examined the potential role of the subfornical organ (SFO), a circumventricular structure that lacks the normal blood-brain barrier, as a CNS site in which ghrelin acts to influence the hypothalamic centers controlling food intake. We report that ghrelin increased intracellular calcium concentrations in 28% (12 of 43) of dissociated SFO neurons and that the SFO expresses mRNA for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Whole-cell patch recordings from SFO neurons demonstrated that in 29% (9 of 31) of neurons tested ghrelin induced a mean depolarization of 7.4 +/- 0.69 mV, accompanied by an increase in action potential frequency. Voltage-clamp recordings revealed that ghrelin activates a putative nonselective cationic conductance. Previous reports that the satiety signal amylin exerts similar excitatory effects on SFO neurons led us to examine whether these two peptides influence different subpopulations of SFO neurons. Concentration-dependent depolarizing effects of amylin were observed in 59% (28 of 47) of SFO neurons (mean depolarization, 8.32 +/- 0.60 mV). In contrast to ghrelin, voltage-clamp recordings suggest that amylin influences a voltage-dependent current activated at depolarized potentials. We tested single SFO neurons with both peptides and identified cells responsive only to ghrelin (n = 9) and only to amylin (n = 7) but no cells that responded to both peptides. These data support a role for the SFO as a center at which ghrelin and amylin may influence separate subpopulations of neurons to influence the hypothalamic regulation of feeding.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCalciumCalcium SignalingFeeding BehaviorHippocampusIn Vitro TechniquesMaleNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRibonucleasesSubfornical OrganCalciumRibonucleases

Identifiers

PMID16481435
PMCPMC6674925
OpenAlexW1972953707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.