ReviewJournal of human genetics2006
Fifty years of genetic epidemiology, with special reference to Japan.
Review in Journal of human genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome scanning by composite likelihood.American journal of human genetics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic epidemiology deals with etiology, distribution, and control of disease in groups of relatives and with inherited causes of disease in populations. It took its first steps before its recognition as a discipline, and did not reach its present scope until the Human Genome Project succeeded. The intimate relationship between genetics and epidemiology was discussed by Neel and Schull (1954), just a year after Watson and Crick reported the DNA double helix, and 2 years before human cytogenetics and the Japan Society of Human Genetics were founded. It is convenient to divide the next half-century into three phases. The first of these (1956-1979) was before DNA polymorphisms were typed, and so the focus was on segregation and linkage of major genes, cytogenetics, population studies, and biochemical genetics. The next phase (1980-2001) progressively identified DNA polymorphisms and their application to complex inheritance. The last phase began with a reliable sequence of the human genome (2002), followed by exploration of genomic diversity. Linkage continues to be useful to study recombination and to map major genes, but association mapping gives much greater resolution and enables studies of complex inheritance. The generation now entering human genetics will have collaborative opportunities undreamed of a few years ago, without the independence that led to great advances during the past half-century.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16479316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.