ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2006
Giant vascular eccrine spiradenoma: report of a case with immunohistochemical study.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Eccrine spiradenoma of the shoulder mimicking a vascular lesion on ultrasonography and CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Giant Scapular Vascular Eccrine Spiroadenomas: A Rare Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Article
- Successful surgical removal of a cutaneous lesion compatible with gigantic vascular eccrine spiradenoma: a rare case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Giant vascular eccrine spiradenoma: the first case in the scrotum and review of the literature author.Diagnostic pathology · 2021Review
- Giant vascular eccrine spiradenoma presenting as a thrombosed varix.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2019Article
- Case of recurrence of spiradenoma in palpebral conjunctiva.BMC ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Giant vascular eccrine spiradenoma.Annals of dermatology · 2011Article
- Differential considerations of skin tumours with florid vascularisation: report of a solitary giant vascular eccrine spiradenoma.BMJ case reports · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a rare case of giant vascular eccrine spiradenoma (GVES) which developed in 56-yr-old Korean woman. It is a rare variant of eccrine spiradenoma (ES), which might be mistaken for angiomatous lesions in view of its florid vascularity and hemorrhagic features. Histogenesis of GVES is not clearly elucidated although it is known that ES presumably originates in the eccrine glands. To clarify the histogenesis of GVES, immunohistochemical stainings using various monoclonal antibodies were also performed. The tumor was composed of three types of cells, namely pale epithelial cells, small basal cells, and myoepithelial cells. Therefore, we conclude that GVES originated from eccrine gland and mainly differentiates toward secretory portion of secretory coil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.