Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16478289›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2006

SSRIs and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: what is known and how should it influence prescribing?

Susanne O Dalton, Henrik T Sørensen, Christoffer Johansen

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: measurement of effect on platelet function.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2008
    Trial
  4. Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Child with Megalencephaly-capillary Malformation-polymicrogyria Syndrome: A Case Report.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. SSRI-induced coagulopathy: is it reality?Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2011
    Article
  15. Consultation-liaison psychiatry for patients with headaches.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne O DaltonInstitute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark. sanne@cancer.dk
Henrik T Sørensen
Christoffer Johansen
Danish Cancer Society · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SSRIs have achieved a high usage rate in the treatment of depression because of a similar efficacy to TCAs and a favourable safety and tolerability profile. However, SSRI use has been associated with bleeding. We reviewed the epidemiological evidence on the association between SSRI use alone and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and on synergistic effects reported with other commonly used drugs that can also cause bleeding.A literature search identified four studies of SSRI use and risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a further two studies of SSRI use and bleeding in general, including upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The available evidence indicates quite convincingly that SSRI use may play a causal role in upper gastrointestinal bleeding and that these drugs may act synergistically with other bleeding risk-increasing medications such as NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin. Assuming a causal role of SSRIs, reported excess gastrointestinal bleedings attributable to SSRI use was reported to be 3.1 per 1000 treatment years, 4.1 per 1000 treatment years among octogenarians and 11.7 per 1000 treatment years among persons with prior upper gastrointestinal bleeding. These non-negligible risks warrant that prescribing doctors consider strategies on the individual level to reduce the likelihood of an upper gastrointestinal adverse event. Patients at particular risk include those with previous ulcers or gastrointestinal bleeding, the elderly and those with certain concurrent illnesses and/or high-risk comedications. Suggested strategies include alternatives to SSRI use, prescribing of less gastrotoxic NSAIDs or co-prescribing of gastroprotective drugs. Patients should be informed about the likelihood of possible upper gastrointestinal bleeding and high-risk patients should be followed closely.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalClinical Trials as TopicDepressionGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansReview Literature as TopicRisk FactorsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16478289
OpenAlexW2087035428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.