Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16477025›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Relevance and safety of telomerase for human tissue engineering.

Rebecca Y Klinger, Juliana L Blum, Bevin Hearn, Benjamin Lebow, Laura E Niklason

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel utilization of serum in tissue decellularization.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2010
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Telomerase and the aging process.Experimental gerontology · 2007
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca Y KlingerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Juliana L Blum
Bevin Hearn
Benjamin Lebow
Laura E Niklason
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Arteries Engineered from Porcine Vascular CellsR01HL063766 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NIKLASON, LAURA E · 2002 to 2005
$1.2M
Novel Cellular Lifespan Extension for Tissue EngineeringR21HL081560 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NIKLASON, LAURA E · 2005 to 2006
$412k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL63766NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL063766NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL081560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering holds the promise of replacing damaged or diseased tissues and organs. The use of autologous donor cells is often not feasible because of the limited replicative lifespan of cells, particularly those derived from elderly patients. Proliferative arrest can be overcome by the ectopic expression of telomerase via human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene transfection. To study the efficacy and safety of this potentially valuable technology, we used differentiated vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) and vascular tissue engineering as a model system. Although we previously demonstrated that vessels engineered with telomerase-expressing SMC had improved mechanics over those grown with control cells, it is critical to assess the phenotypic impact of telomerase expression in donor cells, because telomerase up-regulation is observed in >95% of human malignancies. To study the impact of telomerase in tissue engineering, expression of hTERT was retrovirally induced in SMC from eight elderly patients and one young donor. In hTERT SMC, significant lifespan extension beyond that of control was achieved without population doubling time acceleration. Karyotype changes were seen in both control and hTERT SMC but were not clonal nor representative of cancerous change. hTERT cells also failed to show evidence of neoplastic transformation in functional assays of tumorigenicity. In addition, the impact of donor age on cellular behavior, particularly the synthetic capability of SMC, was not affected by hTERT expression. Hence, this tissue engineering model system highlights the impact of donor age on cellular synthetic function that appears to be independent of lifespan extension by hTERT.

Indexed as

Blood VesselsChromosome AberrationsCell Culture TechniquesCell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansMuscle, Smooth, VascularMyocytes, Smooth MuscleRetroviridaeTelomeraseTelomereTissue EngineeringTransfectionDNA-Binding ProteinsTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID16477025
PMCPMC1413782
OpenAlexW2002397336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.