Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16475505›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2005

Intramucosal bacteria in colon cancer and their elimination by probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M-74 with organic selenium.

M Mego, J Májek, R Konceková, L Ebringer, S Cierniková, P Rauko, M Kovác, J Trupl, P Slezák, V Zajac

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Role of Probiotics in health improvement, infection control and disease treatment and management.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M MegoDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia. misomego@mediclub.sk
J Májek
R Konceková
L Ebringer
S Cierniková
P Rauko
M Kovác
J Trupl
P Slezák
V Zajac
Cancer Research Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKComenius University Bratislava · SKSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKSlovak Medical University · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraepithelial bacteria were isolated by the gentamicin protection assay (GPA) from biopsy samples obtained at colonoscopy (colon cancer, n = 10 patients; colonic adenoma, n = 20; control group, n = 20; cancer patients without gastrointestinal tract GIT malignancy, n = 10). After a three-month administration of E. faecium M-74 to patients with positive GPA biopsies, 172 biopsy specimens from 60 patients were examined with the GPA. The number of biopsies with intracellular bacteria was significantly higher in adenoma and carcinoma group than in control group (26 vs. 10%; p = 0.004); in cancer patients without GIT malignancy the difference was nonsignificant. E. faecium M-74 was also administered to 5 patients with colonic adenoma; according to a control colonoscopy the number of biopsies with intracellular bacteria was significantly lower after probiotic administration (48 vs. 16%; p = 0.03). A striking prevalence of intraepithelial bacteria was also showed in patients with large bowel adenoma and carcinoma. The administration of probiotic strain M-74 can thus be considered to be an effective and promising method for elimination of pathogenic bacteria in the case of inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer.

Indexed as

Enterococcus faeciumAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyColonic NeoplasmsEnterobacteriaceaeFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMiddle AgedProbioticsSeleniumSelenium

Identifiers

PMID16475505
OpenAlexW1996607396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.