ArticleFolia microbiologica2005
Distribution of secreted aspartyl proteinases using a polymerase chain reaction assay with SAP specific primers in Candida albicans isolates.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic and molecular detection of virulence factor genesMedical journal, Armed Forces India · 2022Article
- Differences in proteolytic activity and gene profiles of fungal strains isolated from the total parenteral nutrition patients.Folia microbiologica · 2011Article
- Effects of antifungal agents in sap activity of Candida albicans isolates.Mycopathologia · 2010Article
- Importance of biofilm in Candida parapsilosis and evaluation of its susceptibility to antifungal agents by colorimetric method.Folia microbiologica · 2007Article
- Candidiasis--do we need to fight or to tolerate the Candida fungus?Folia microbiologica · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secreted aspartyl proteinase (Sap) distribution among different C. albicans isolates was determined using SAP-specific primers in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. SAP1, SAP2, and SAP3 were detected in 13 of 40 (32.5%), SAP4 in 38/40 (95%), SAP5 were detected in 30/40 (75%), SAP6 in 23/40 (57.5%) of C. albicans strains isolated from blood cultures. SAP1-SAP3 were detected in 37 of 40 (92.5%), SAP4 were detected in 3/40 (7.5%), SAP5 in 3/40 (7.5%), SAP6 in 5/40 (12.5%) of C. albicans strains isolated from vaginal swab cultures. Sap1, Sap2 and Sap3 isoenzymes were found to be related to the vaginopathic potential of C. albicans; Sap4, Sap5 and Sap6 isoenzymes were found to be correlated with systemic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.