Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16472399›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2006

Older adults' beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy: a cross-sectional survey.

Christine E Kistler, Carmen L Lewis, Halle R Amick, Debra L Bynum, Louise C Walter, Lea C Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prognosis Communication in Late-Life Disability: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Self-rated health as a tool for estimating health-adjusted life expectancy among patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer: a preliminary study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine E KistlerFamily Medicine, University of Michigan, Ypsilanti, MI 48198, USA. ckistler@med.umich.edu
Carmen L Lewis
Halle R Amick
Debra L Bynum
Louise C Walter
Lea C Watson

Funding

Zonisamide in Patients with Neuropathic Pain Associated with Diabetic NeuropathyM01RR000046 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JOY, MELANIE S · 1985 to 2008
$38.5M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000046NCRR NIH HHS RR00046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimates of life expectancy assist physicians and patients in medical decision-making. The time-delayed benefits for many medical treatments make an older adult's life expectancy estimate particularly important for physicians. The purpose of this study is to assess older adults' beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy.

methodsWe performed a mixed qualitative-quantitative cross-sectional study in which 116 healthy adults aged 70+ were recruited from two local retirement communities. We interviewed them regarding their beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy in the context of a larger study on cancer screening beliefs. Semi-structured interviews of 80 minutes average duration were performed in private locations convenient to participants. Demographic characteristics as well as cancer screening beliefs and beliefs about life expectancy were measured. Two independent researchers reviewed the open-ended responses and recorded the most common themes. The research team resolved disagreements by consensus.

resultsThis article reports the life-expectancy results portion of the larger study. The study group (n = 116) was comprised of healthy, well-educated older adults, with almost a third over 85 years old, and none meeting criteria for dementia. Sixty-four percent (n = 73) felt that their physicians could not correctly estimate their life expectancy. Sixty-six percent (n = 75) wanted their physicians to talk with them about their life expectancy. The themes that emerged from our study indicate that discussions of life expectancy could help older adults plan for the future, maintain open communication with their physicians, and provide them knowledge about their medical conditions.

conclusionThe majority of the healthy older adults in this study were open to discussions about life expectancy in the context of discussing cancer screening tests, despite awareness that their physicians' estimates could be inaccurate. Since about a third of participants perceived these discussions as not useful or even harmful, physicians should first ascertain patients' preferences before discussing their life expectancies.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDecision MakingLife ExpectancyPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHousing for the ElderlyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningNeoplasmsNorth Carolina

Identifiers

PMID16472399
PMCPMC1386682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.