ArticleBMC family practice2006
Older adults' beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC family practice, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient Preferences for Discussing Life Expectancy: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Exploring perceptions of online calculators for identifying community-dwelling older people at risk of dying: A qualitative study.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2023Review
- Preferences for Discussing Life Expectancy: a Cross-sectional Survey Among Geriatric Outpatients in Denmark.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Strategies for discussing long-term prognosis when deciding on cancer screening for adults over age 75.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- A Strategy to Prepare Primary Care Clinicians for Discussing Stopping Cancer Screening With Adults Older Than 75 Years.Innovation in aging · 2020Article
- How Do Older Adults Consider Age, Life Expectancy, Quality of Life, and Physician Recommendations When Making Cancer Screening Decisions? Results from a National Survey Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019Article
- Communicating About Stopping Cancer Screening: Comparing Clinicians' and Older Adults' Perspectives.The Gerontologist · 2019Article
- "Planting the Seed": Perceived Benefits of and Strategies for Discussing Long-Term Prognosis with Older Adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2018Article
- Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Long-Term Life Expectancy: Results From a National Survey.Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- Prognosis Communication in Late-Life Disability: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017Article
- Predicting Mortality up to 14 Years Among Community-Dwelling Adults Aged 65 and Older.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017Article
- Older adults' preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice.Patient preference and adherence · 2015Article
- Individualizing cancer screening in older adults: a narrative review and framework for future research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013Review
- Self-rated health as a tool for estimating health-adjusted life expectancy among patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer: a preliminary study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011Article
- Older Adults' Preferences for When and How to Discuss Life Expectancy in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
- Prognosis communication with older patients with multimorbidity: Assessment after an educational intervention.Gerontology & geriatrics educationArticle
- Individualized Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Older Adults and Their Primary Care Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEstimates of life expectancy assist physicians and patients in medical decision-making. The time-delayed benefits for many medical treatments make an older adult's life expectancy estimate particularly important for physicians. The purpose of this study is to assess older adults' beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy.
methodsWe performed a mixed qualitative-quantitative cross-sectional study in which 116 healthy adults aged 70+ were recruited from two local retirement communities. We interviewed them regarding their beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy in the context of a larger study on cancer screening beliefs. Semi-structured interviews of 80 minutes average duration were performed in private locations convenient to participants. Demographic characteristics as well as cancer screening beliefs and beliefs about life expectancy were measured. Two independent researchers reviewed the open-ended responses and recorded the most common themes. The research team resolved disagreements by consensus.
resultsThis article reports the life-expectancy results portion of the larger study. The study group (n = 116) was comprised of healthy, well-educated older adults, with almost a third over 85 years old, and none meeting criteria for dementia. Sixty-four percent (n = 73) felt that their physicians could not correctly estimate their life expectancy. Sixty-six percent (n = 75) wanted their physicians to talk with them about their life expectancy. The themes that emerged from our study indicate that discussions of life expectancy could help older adults plan for the future, maintain open communication with their physicians, and provide them knowledge about their medical conditions.
conclusionThe majority of the healthy older adults in this study were open to discussions about life expectancy in the context of discussing cancer screening tests, despite awareness that their physicians' estimates could be inaccurate. Since about a third of participants perceived these discussions as not useful or even harmful, physicians should first ascertain patients' preferences before discussing their life expectancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.