Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16470414›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2006

Differential display analysis of gene expression in two immunologically distinct strains of Eimeria maxima.

S C Basak, S Lee, J R Barta, M A Fernando

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. RNA-Seq of Phenotypically DistinctPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S C BasakDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Ontario, Canada, mfernand@uoguelph.ca.
S Lee
J R Barta
M A Fernando

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression during sporulation and sporozoite excystation of two strains of Eimeria maxima was analyzed using the mRNA differential display technique. The two strains, the Guelph strain (GS) and a single sporocyst-derived strain (M6) from Florida, have been shown to be immunologically distinct. We isolated and cloned a 453-bp complimentary DNA (cDNA) fragment (GS-453) found only in GS sporozoites. In GS, this mRNA begins to be expressed during the earliest stages of oocyst sporulation and is continuously expressed up to and including in the excysted sporozoite. In all Northern blots, digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled GS-453 probe recognized an mRNA of approximately 1.6 kb from GS but not from RNA of M6. Southern blots using various endonucleases and probed with DIG-labeled GS-453 demonstrated that the genomes of both strains contained sufficiently similar sequences to permit hybridization with the probe, but the pattern of hybridization differed between the two strains. Extensive searches of the GenBank, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, and various apicomplexan expressed sequence tag databases using the DNA or inferred amino acid sequences of GS-453 cDNA clone did not identify similarity to any existing sequences.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBlotting, NorthernChickensCoccidiosisDNA, ProtozoanEimeriaGene Expression ProfilingMolecular Sequence DataPoultry DiseasesRNA, MessengerRNA, ProtozoanSpecies SpecificitySpores, ProtozoanSporozoitesTime FactorsDNA, ProtozoanRNA, MessengerRNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.