ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2006
Heart diseases and stroke.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomics of the heart.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A heterogeneous group of heart diseases, varying by cardiac anatomy and physiology, are responsible for a variety of embolic materials that result in cerebral and systemic embolism. Atrial fibrillation accounts for nearly half of all cardioembolic stroke, particularly in the elderly, but in the young congenital septal abnormalities such as patent foramen ovale play a more important role. Therapeutic strategies include stabilization or treatment of the underlying heart disease and prevention of embolism. Oral anticoagulant therapy is indicated for many but decision making on balancing the benefits versus risks can be difficult. New endovascular therapies and devices have become available and await clinical trials that allow them to be compared with existing medical therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.