Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16469098›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006

Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources.

Mario Stanke, Oliver Schöffmann, Burkhard Morgenstern, Stephan Waack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 855 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
855citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

855 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Dynamics of Allotetraploid Cotton Species (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome analysis of the glycosphingolipid-producing green alga tetraselmis sp. NKG400013.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

795 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mario Stankelnstitut für Mikrobiologie und Genetik, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. mstanke@gwdg.de
Oliver Schöffmann
Burkhard Morgenstern
Stephan Waack

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to improve gene prediction, extrinsic evidence on the gene structure can be collected from various sources of information such as genome-genome comparisons and EST and protein alignments. However, such evidence is often incomplete and usually uncertain. The extrinsic evidence is usually not sufficient to recover the complete gene structure of all genes completely and the available evidence is often unreliable. Therefore extrinsic evidence is most valuable when it is balanced with sequence-intrinsic evidence.

resultsWe present a fairly general method for integration of external information. Our method is based on the evaluation of hints to potentially protein-coding regions by means of a Generalized Hidden Markov Model (GHMM) that takes both intrinsic and extrinsic information into account. We used this method to extend the ab initio gene prediction program AUGUSTUS to a versatile tool that we call AUGUSTUS+. In this study, we focus on hints derived from matches to an EST or protein database, but our approach can be used to include arbitrary user-defined hints. Our method is only moderately effected by the length of a database match. Further, it exploits the information that can be derived from the absence of such matches. As a special case, AUGUSTUS+ can predict genes under user-defined constraints, e.g. if the positions of certain exons are known. With hints from EST and protein databases, our new approach was able to predict 89% of the exons in human chromosome 22 correctly.

conclusionSensitive probabilistic modeling of extrinsic evidence such as sequence database matches can increase gene prediction accuracy. When a match of a sequence interval to an EST or protein sequence is used it should be treated as compound information rather than as information about individual positions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticModels, GeneticAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBase SequenceChromosome MappingComputer SimulationGenetic VariationHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMarkov ChainsModels, StatisticalMolecular Sequence DataPattern Recognition, AutomatedSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID16469098
PMCPMC1409804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.