ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2006
Comparison of androgen receptor CAG and GGN repeat length polymorphism in humans and apes.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chimpanzee Extraversion scores vary with epigenetic modification of dopamine receptor gene D2 (Epigenetics · 2022Article
- Plasma Testosterone and Androstenedione Levels Follow the Same Sex-Specific Patterns in the TwoBiology · 2022Article
- The evolution and polymorphism of mono-amino acid repeats in androgen receptor and their regulatory role in health and disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Polymorphism of CAG repeats in androgen receptor of carnivores.Molecular biology reports · 2012Article
- Comparative analysis of estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms in apes.Primates; journal of primatology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two polymorphic trinucleotide repeats of human androgen receptor gene (hAR), CAG and GGN which encode glutamine and glycine, have been shown to be associated with human diseases. The number of repeats ranges from 8 to 35 for the CAG and from 10 to 30 for the GGN in human populations. Longer CAG repeats are associated with reduced hAR transcriptional activity, spinal bulbar muscular atrophy and lower cognitive function in older men, whereas shorter CAG repeats are associated with increased risk of prostate cancer and infertility in men. The functional roles of the CAG and GGN repeats have not been clarified. In order to compare the sequence of the CAG and GGN regions in apes, we analyzed 57 chimpanzees, 18 gorillas, 20 orangutans, 16 agile gibbons, and 17 siamangs by PCR and electrophoresis. Two bonobos and one long-tailed macaque were also sequenced and the sequences of all species were aligned, respectively, with one human registered sequence. Seventeen different alleles (4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, and 17-26 repeats) and 11 alleles (11-14 and 16-22 repeats) were detected at the CAG and the GGN loci, respectively. Although the repeat tract was conserved among apes, chimpanzees had alleles with a wide range of repeat lengths: (CAG)(14-26) and (GGN)(14-22). Gorillas were less polymorphic with the (CAG)(8) and (GGN)(19) alleles being most common, and orangutans exhibited monomorphic (CAG)(11) and (GGN)(22) alleles. On the other hand, agile gibbons and siamangs had the shortest (CAG)(4) allele, but showed variable length of GGN repeats (11-13 in agile gibbons and 16-21 in siamangs). In chimpanzees, frequent haplotypes consisting of short CAG repeats and long GGN repeats or vice versa was observed as in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.