Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16467639›Full record

ArticleJournal of hypertension2006

Blood pressure and the global burden of disease 2000. Part 1: estimates of blood pressure levels.

Carlene M M Lawes, Stephen Vander Hoorn, Malcolm R Law, Paul Elliott, Stephen MacMahon, Anthony Rodgers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hypertension, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Different Doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared with Olmesartan in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to hypertension: a HuGE review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2008
    Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure with Hypertension Patients: Real-World Experiences on Different Ages, Drug Doses, and Renal Functions.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Myokines and Adipokines in Hypertension and Hypertension-related Complications.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Carlene M M LawesClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. c.lawes@ctru.auckland.ac.nz
Stephen Vander Hoorn
Malcolm R Law
Paul Elliott
Stephen MacMahon
Anthony Rodgers
University of Auckland · NZImperial College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide global estimates of blood pressure by age and sex for adults aged > or = 30 years, by WHO subregion. DESIGN AND

methodsData were obtained from studies identified in a literature review of population-based surveys. These were complemented by data from MONICA and INTERSALT studies. Estimates of the shape of the age-systolic blood pressure (SBP) association were made from survey data utilizing parametric and non-parametric analyses. A linear sex-specific association of SBP with age was demonstrated from 30 to 70 years in females and 20 to 70 years for males in each subregion. Mean age- and sex-specific estimates of SBP were estimated for each WHO subregion separately, based on study and country-weighted SBP data.

resultsAnalyses were based on data from about 230 surveys and over 660 000 participants. Age-specific mean SBP values ranged from 114 to 164 mmHg for females, and 117-153 mmHg for males. Females typically had lower SBP levels than males in the 30-44-year age groups, but in all subregions, SBP levels rose more steeply with age for females than males. Therefore, SBP levels in those aged > or = 60 years tended to be higher in females. Subregions with consistently high mean SBP levels included parts of eastern Europe and Africa. Mean SBP levels were lowest in south-east Asia and parts of the western Pacific.

conclusionsThese global estimates of blood pressure by age, sex and subregion show considerable variation in estimated levels. The lack of data in developing countries is substantial, and this is an important limitation given the role of blood pressure in increasing cardiovascular disease levels.

Indexed as

Blood PressureGlobal HealthAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID16467639
OpenAlexW1964467403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.