Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16467473›Full record

ArticleEukaryotic cell2006

Rac1 and Cdc42 have different roles in Candida albicans development.

Martine Bassilana, Robert A Arkowitz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eukaryotic cell, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Jekyll to Hyde: The Yeast-Hyphal Transition ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Protein markers forJournal of extracellular vesicles · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fungal morphogenesis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martine BassilanaInstitute of Signaling, Developmental Biology, and Cancer, CNRS UMR 6543, Université de Nice, Faculté des Sciences-Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice Cedex 2, France. mbassila@unice.fr
Robert A Arkowitz
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the role of the highly conserved G protein Rac1 in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans. We identified and disrupted RAC1 and show here that, in contrast to CDC42, it is not necessary for viability or serum-induced hyphal growth but is essential for filamentous growth when cells are embedded in a matrix. Rac1 is localized to the plasma membrane, yet its distribution is more homogenous than that of Cdc42, with no enrichment at the tips of either buds or hyphae. In addition, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching results indicate that Rac1 and Cdc42 have different dynamics at the membrane. Furthermore, overexpression of Rac1 does not complement Cdc42 function, and conversely, overexpression of Cdc42 does not complement Rac1 function. Thus, Rac1 and Cdc42, although highly similar to one another, have different roles in C. albicans development.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCandida albicanscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCell MembraneCell SurvivalGene DeletionGene ExpressionGenetic Complementation TestMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProtein Transportrac1 GTP-Binding ProteinSequence Alignmentcdc42 GTP-Binding Proteinrac1 GTP-Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID16467473
PMCPMC1405900
OpenAlexW2167601590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.