Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16467233›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2006

Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of colorectal cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial.

Shirley A A Beresford, Karen C Johnson, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Norman L Lasser, Linda G Snetselaar, Henry R Black, Garnet L Anderson, Annlouise R Assaf, Tamsen Bassford, Deborah Bowen and 37 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000611 (Women's Health Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
47.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000611 phase3completednot on this map

Women's Health Initiative (WHI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)ConditionsBone Diseases, Breast Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases, Colonic NeoplasmsArmshormone replacement therapy, estrogens, progestins, estrogen replacement therapy, diet, fat-restricted
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 399 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Effects of total fat intake on body fatness in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Effects of total fat intake on body weight.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  14. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Shirley A A BeresfordDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7236, USA. beresfrd@u.washington.edu
Karen C Johnson
Cheryl Ritenbaugh
Norman L Lasser
Linda G Snetselaar
Henry R Black
Garnet L Anderson
Annlouise R Assaf
Tamsen Bassford
Deborah Bowen
Robert L Brunner
Robert G Brzyski
Bette Caan
Rowan T Chlebowski
Margery Gass
Rosanne C Harrigan
Jennifer Hays
David Heber
Gerardo Heiss
Susan L Hendrix
Barbara V Howard
Judith Hsia
F Allan Hubbell
Rebecca D Jackson
Jane Morley Kotchen
Lewis H Kuller
Andrea Z LaCroix
Dorothy S Lane
Robert D Langer
Cora E Lewis
JoAnn E Manson
Karen L Margolis
Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani
Judith K Ockene
Linda M Parker
Michael G Perri
Lawrence Phillips
Ross L Prentice
John Robbins
Jacques E Rossouw
Gloria E Sarto
Marcia L Stefanick
Linda Van Horn
Mara Z Vitolins
Jean Wactawski-Wende
Robert B Wallace
Evelyn Whitlock
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBuffalo State University · USEmory University · USGeorge Washington University · USHarvard University Press · USHoward University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USNational Institutes of Health · USNorthwestern University · USPfizer (United States) · USRush University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USStanford University · USStony Brook University · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextObservational studies and polyp recurrence trials are not conclusive regarding the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on risk of colorectal cancer, necessitating a primary prevention trial.

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of a low-fat eating pattern on risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial, a randomized controlled trial conducted in 48,835 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years recruited between 1993 and 1998 from 40 clinical centers throughout the United States.

interventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to the dietary modification intervention (n = 19,541; 40%) or the comparison group (n = 29,294; 60%). The intensive behavioral modification program aimed to motivate and support reductions in dietary fat, to increase consumption of vegetables and fruits, and to increase grain servings by using group sessions, self-monitoring techniques, and other tailored and targeted strategies. Women in the comparison group continued their usual eating pattern.

main outcome measureInvasive colorectal cancer incidence.

resultsA total of 480 incident cases of invasive colorectal cancer occurred during a mean follow-up of 8.1 (SD, 1.7) years. Intervention group participants significantly reduced their percentage of energy from fat by 10.7% more than did the comparison group at 1 year, and this difference between groups was mostly maintained (8.1% at year 6). Statistically significant increases in vegetable, fruit, and grain servings were also made. Despite these dietary changes, there was no evidence that the intervention reduced the risk of invasive colorectal cancer during the follow-up period. There were 201 women with invasive colorectal cancer (0.13% per year) in the intervention group and 279 (0.12% per year) in the comparison group (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.29). Secondary analyses suggested potential interactions with baseline aspirin use and combined estrogen-progestin use status (P = .01 for each). Colorectal examination rates, although not protocol defined, were comparable between the intervention and comparison groups. Similar results were seen in analyses adjusting for adherence to the intervention.

conclusionIn this study, a low-fat dietary pattern intervention did not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women during 8.1 years of follow-up. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611.

Indexed as

Diet, Fat-RestrictedAdenomaAgedAspirinColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLikelihood FunctionsMiddle AgedPostmenopausePrimary PreventionProportional Hazards ModelsAspirin

Identifiers

PMID16467233
OpenAlexW2147243554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.