Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16467232›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2006

Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial.

Ross L Prentice, Bette Caan, Rowan T Chlebowski, Ruth Patterson, Lewis H Kuller, Judith K Ockene, Karen L Margolis, Marian C Limacher, JoAnn E Manson, Linda M Parker and 38 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000611 (Women's Health Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 257 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
257citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
42.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000611 phase3completednot on this map

Women's Health Initiative (WHI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)ConditionsBone Diseases, Breast Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases, Colonic NeoplasmsArmshormone replacement therapy, estrogens, progestins, estrogen replacement therapy, diet, fat-restricted
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

257 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 828 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Effects of total fat intake on body fatness in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Weight Loss Randomized Intervention Trials in Female Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Pooled it
  13. Effects of total fat intake on body weight.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  14. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  17. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Low-Fat Dietary Modification and Risk of Ductal CarcinomaCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Trial

197 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ross L PrenticeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash 98109, USA. rprentice@whi.org
Bette Caan
Rowan T Chlebowski
Ruth Patterson
Lewis H Kuller
Judith K Ockene
Karen L Margolis
Marian C Limacher
JoAnn E Manson
Linda M Parker
Electra Paskett
Lawrence Phillips
John Robbins
Jacques E Rossouw
Gloria E Sarto
James M Shikany
Marcia L Stefanick
Cynthia A Thomson
Linda Van Horn
Mara Z Vitolins
Jean Wactawski-Wende
Robert B Wallace
Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller
Evelyn Whitlock
Katsuhiko Yano
Lucile Adams-Campbell
Garnet L Anderson
Annlouise R Assaf
Shirley A A Beresford
Henry R Black
Robert L Brunner
Robert G Brzyski
Leslie Ford
Margery Gass
Jennifer Hays
David Heber
Gerardo Heiss
Susan L Hendrix
Judith Hsia
F Allan Hubbell
Rebecca D Jackson
Karen C Johnson
Jane Morley Kotchen
Andrea Z LaCroix
Dorothy S Lane
Robert D Langer
Norman L Lasser
Maureen M Henderson
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe hypothesis that a low-fat dietary pattern can reduce breast cancer risk has existed for decades but has never been tested in a controlled intervention trial.

objectiveTo assess the effects of undertaking a low-fat dietary pattern on breast cancer incidence. DESIGN AND

settingA randomized, controlled, primary prevention trial conducted at 40 US clinical centers from 1993 to 2005.

participantsA total of 48,835 postmenopausal women, aged 50 to 79 years, without prior breast cancer, including 18.6% of minority race/ethnicity, were enrolled.

interventionsWomen were randomly assigned to the dietary modification intervention group (40% [n = 19,541]) or the comparison group (60% [n = 29,294]). The intervention was designed to promote dietary change with the goals of reducing intake of total fat to 20% of energy and increasing consumption of vegetables and fruit to at least 5 servings daily and grains to at least 6 servings daily. Comparison group participants were not asked to make dietary changes.

main outcome measureInvasive breast cancer incidence.

resultsDietary fat intake was significantly lower in the dietary modification intervention group compared with the comparison group. The difference between groups in change from baseline for percentage of energy from fat varied from 10.7% at year 1 to 8.1% at year 6. Vegetable and fruit consumption was higher in the intervention group by at least 1 serving per day and a smaller, more transient difference was found for grain consumption. The number of women who developed invasive breast cancer (annualized incidence rate) over the 8.1-year average follow-up period was 655 (0.42%) in the intervention group and 1072 (0.45%) in the comparison group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.01 for the comparison between the 2 groups). Secondary analyses suggest a lower hazard ratio among adherent women, provide greater evidence of risk reduction among women having a high-fat diet at baseline, and suggest a dietary effect that varies by hormone receptor characteristics of the tumor.

conclusionsAmong postmenopausal women, a low-fat dietary pattern did not result in a statistically significant reduction in invasive breast cancer risk over an 8.1-year average follow-up period. However, the nonsignificant trends observed suggesting reduced risk associated with a low-fat dietary pattern indicate that longer, planned, nonintervention follow-up may yield a more definitive comparison. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611.

Indexed as

Diet, Fat-RestrictedAgedBiomarkersBody WeightBreast NeoplasmsCholesterol, LDLDiet RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPostmenopausePrimary PreventionProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLGonadal Steroid HormonesSex Hormone-Binding Globulin

Identifiers

PMID16467232
OpenAlexW2735620790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.