Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16464714›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Timothy M Bateman, Gary V Heller, A Iain McGhie, John D Friedman, James A Case, Jan R Bryngelson, Ginger K Hertenstein, Kelly L Moutray, Kimberly Reid, S James Cullom

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 179 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01179230 completednot on this map

A Prospective Comparison of Gated, Rest/Stress Rubidium-82 Position Emission Computed Tomography (PET) vs. Gated, Rest / Stress Technetium 99-m SPECT

TypeobservationalSponsorHartford HospitalRan2005 to 2012Enrolled136ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia, Heart DiseaseArmsSPECT imaging, PET imaging
NCT04475094 unknown statusnot on this map

Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status

TypeobservationalSponsorCardiovascular Imaging TechnologiesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled75ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsRubidium-82, Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7, Rose Dyspnea Scale
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 527 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Improved assessment of coronary artery disease in obese patients with flurpiridaz-Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Comparative evaluation of a novel [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Focus on Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A highly predictive cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) risk score for 90-day and one-year major adverse cardiac events and revascularization.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy M BatemanCardiovascular Consultants, PC, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA. tbateman@cc-pc.com
Gary V Heller
A Iain McGhie
John D Friedman
James A Case
Jan R Bryngelson
Ginger K Hertenstein
Kelly L Moutray
Kimberly Reid
S James Cullom
Heart Imaging Technologies (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USClinical Research Consultants (United States) · USHartford Financial Services (United States)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) have evolved considerably over the last decade, there is no recent comparison of diagnostic performance. This study was designed to assess relative image quality, interpretive confidence, and diagnostic accuracy by use of contemporary technology and protocols. METHODS AND

resultsBy consensus and without clinical information, 4 experienced nuclear cardiologists interpreted 112 SPECT technetium-99m sestamibi and 112 PET rubidium-82 MPI electrocardiography (ECG)-gated rest/pharmacologic stress studies in patient populations matched by gender, body mass index, and presence and extent of coronary disease. The patients were categorized as having a low likelihood for coronary artery disease (27 in each group) or had coronary angiography within 60 days. SPECT scans were acquired on a Cardio-60 system and PET scans on an ECAT ACCEL scanner. Image quality was excellent for 78% and 79% of rest and stress PET scans, respectively, versus 62% and 62% of respective SPECT scans (both p<.05). An equal percent of PET and SPECT gated images were rated excellent in quality. Interpretations were definitely normal or abnormal for 96% of PET scans versus 81% of SPECT scans (p=.001). Diagnostic accuracy was higher for PET for both stenosis severity thresholds of 70% (89% vs 79%, p=.03) and 50% (87% vs 71%, p=.003) and was higher in men and women, in obese and nonobese patients, and for correct identification of multivessel coronary artery disease.

conclusionIn a large population of matched pharmacologic stress patients, myocardial perfusion PET was superior to SPECT in image quality, interpretive certainty, and diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Rubidium RadioisotopesTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiAgedComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseElectrocardiographyExercise TestFemaleHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonUnited StatesRadiopharmaceuticalsRubidium RadioisotopesTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi

Identifiers

PMID16464714
OpenAlexW2008121884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.