Care of patients with intellectual or learning disability in primary care: no more funding so will there be any change?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Experience and attitudes of general psychiatrists in Turkiye towards persons with intellectual disability/intellectual developmental disorders: a cross-sectional survey.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2025
   Article
2. Adults with intellectual disabilities and mental health disorders in primary care: a scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
   Article
3. Estimated prevalence of people with learning disabilities: template for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
   Article
4. Health problems of people with intellectual disabilities: the impact for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
   Article
5. Health issues of older people with intellectual disability in group homesJournal of intellectual & developmental disability
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as