Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16461907›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Amplification of MET may identify a subset of cancers with extreme sensitivity to the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor PHA-665752.

Gromoslaw A Smolen, Raffaella Sordella, Beth Muir, Gayatry Mohapatra, Anne Barmettler, Heidi Archibald, Woo J Kim, Ross A Okimoto, Daphne W Bell, Dennis C Sgroi and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 250 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
250citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

250 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 482 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MET Oncogene Targeting for Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Targeting MET in NSCLC: An Ever-Expanding Territory.JTO clinical and research reports · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

190 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gromoslaw A SmolenCancer Center and Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Raffaella Sordella
Beth Muir
Gayatry Mohapatra
Anne Barmettler
Heidi Archibald
Woo J Kim
Ross A Okimoto
Daphne W Bell
Dennis C Sgroi
James G Christensen
Jeffrey Settleman
Daniel A Haber
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

The role of Met proto-oncogene in breast tumorigenesisF32CA117737 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SMOLEN, GROMOSLAW ALEKSANDER · 2005 to 2007
$156k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA117737PHS HHS P01 95281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of molecular targeted therapy in cancer may depend on the selection of appropriate tumor types whose survival depends on the drug target, so-called "oncogene addiction." Preclinical approaches to defining drug-responsive subsets are needed if initial clinical trials are to be directed at the most susceptible patient population. Here, we show that gastric cancer cells with high-level stable chromosomal amplification of the growth factor receptor MET are extraordinarily susceptible to the selective inhibitor PHA-665752. Although MET activation has primarily been linked with tumor cell migration and invasiveness, the amplified wild-type MET in these cells is constitutively activated, and its continued signaling is required for cell survival. Treatment with PHA-665752 triggers massive apoptosis in 5 of 5 gastric cancer cell lines with MET amplification but in 0 of 12 without increased gene copy numbers (P = 0.00016). MET amplification may thus identify a subset of epithelial cancers that are uniquely sensitive to disruption of this pathway and define a patient group that is appropriate for clinical trials of targeted therapy using MET inhibitors.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorCell MovementDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGenetic TestingHumansIndolesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metReceptors, Growth FactorStomach NeoplasmsSulfones5-((2,6-dichlorobenzyl)sulfonyl)-3-((3,5-dimethyl-4-((2-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)carbonyl)-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methylene)-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-oneAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorIndolesMET protein, humanProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metReceptors, Growth FactorSulfones

Identifiers

PMID16461907
PMCPMC1413705
OpenAlexW2013678879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.