Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16461884›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

Dynamic evolution at pericentromeres.

Anne E Hall, Gregory C Kettler, Daphne Preuss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Repetitive sequence-derived markers tag centromeres and telomeres and provide insights into chromosome evolution in Brassica napus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne E HallHoward Hughes Medical Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Gregory C Kettler
Daphne Preuss

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericentromeres are exceptional genomic regions: in animals they contain extensive segmental duplications implicated in gene creation, and in plants they sustain rearrangements and insertions uncommon in euchromatin. To examine the mechanisms and patterns of plant pericentromere evolution, we compared pericentromere sequence from four Brassicaceae species separated by <15 million years (Myr). This flowering plant family is ideal for studying relationships between genome reorganization and pericentromere evolution-its members have undergone recent polyploidization and hybridization, with close relatives changing in genome size and chromosome number. Through sequence and hybridization analyses, we examined regions from Arabidopsis arenosa, Capsella rubella, and Olimarabidopsis pumila that are homologous to Arabidopsis thaliana pericentromeres (peri-CENs) III and V, and used FISH to demonstrate they have been maintained near centromere satellite arrays in each species. Sequence analysis revealed a set of highly conserved genes, yet we discovered substantial differences in intergenic length and species-specific changes in sequence content and gene density. We discovered that A. thaliana has undergone recent, significant expansions within its pericentromeres, in some cases measuring hundreds of kilobases; these findings are in marked contrast to euchromatic segments in these species that exhibit only minor length changes. While plant pericentromeres do contain some duplications, we did not find evidence of extensive segmental duplications, as has been documented in primates. Our data support a model in which plant pericentromeres may experience selective pressures distinct from euchromatin, tolerating rapid, dynamic changes in structure and sequence content, including large insertions of mobile elements, 5S rDNA arrays and pseudogenes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCentromereChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialConserved SequenceDNA, RibosomalDNA Transposable ElementsGenetic VariationIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityArabidopsis ProteinsDNA, RibosomalDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID16461884
PMCPMC1415207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.