Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16461456›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

A pilot clinical trial of a recombinant ricin vaccine in normal humans.

Ellen S Vitetta, Joan E Smallshaw, Elaine Coleman, Hasan Jafri, Callie Foster, Robert Munford, John Schindler

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Search for Antidotes Against Ricin.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Recent advances in the development of vaccines against ricin.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen S VitettaCancer Immunobiology Center, Aston Center, Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. ellen.vitetta@utsouthwestern.edu
Joan E Smallshaw
Elaine Coleman
Hasan Jafri
Callie Foster
Robert Munford
John Schindler
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZPediatrics and Genetics · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ricin, a highly potent toxin produced by castor beans, is classified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a level B biothreat because it is easily produced, readily available, and highly stable. There have been >750 cases of documented ricin intoxication in humans. There is no approved vaccine for ricin. Ricin contains a lectin-binding B chain and a ribotoxic A chain (RTA). In addition to its ribotoxic site, we have identified a separate site on RTA that is responsible for inducing vascular leak syndrome (VLS) in humans. We have generated a recombinant RTA with two amino acid substitutions that disrupt its ribotoxic site (Y80A) and its VLS-inducing site (V76M). This mutant recombinant RTA (named RiVax) was expressed and produced in Escherichia coli and purified. When RiVax was injected i.m. into mice it protected them against a ricin challenge of 10 LD50s. Preclinical studies in both mice and rabbits demonstrated that RiVax was safe. Based on these results, we have now conducted a pilot clinical trial in humans under an investigational new drug application submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. In this study, three groups of five normal volunteers were injected three times at monthly intervals with 10, 33, or 100 mug of RiVax. The vaccine was safe and elicited ricin-neutralizing Abs in one of five individuals in the low-dose group, four of five in the intermediate-dose group, and five of five in the high-dose group. These results justify further development of the vaccine.

Indexed as

BioterrorismAdolescentAdultAmino Acid SubstitutionAntibodiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProtein ConformationRicinVaccinationVaccinesVaccines, SyntheticAntibodiesRicinRiVaxVaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID16461456
PMCPMC1413738
OpenAlexW1984980057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.