Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16461420›Full record

ArticleInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2006

Validating self reported home safety practices in a culturally diverse non-inner city population.

P M Hatfield, A G Staresinic, C A Sorkness, N M Peterson, J Schirmer, M L Katcher

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for promoting smoke alarm ownership and function.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Preventing product-related injuries: a randomized controlled trial of poster alerts.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a series of case-control studies.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2014
    Article
  7. Association between smokefree laws and voluntary smokefree-home rules.American journal of preventive medicine · 2011
    Article
  8. Validation of a HOME Injury Survey.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2009
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P M HatfieldUniversity of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
A G Staresinic
C A Sorkness
N M Peterson
J Schirmer
M L Katcher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the validity of face to face, self reported responses to questions about the presence of safety devices and use of safety practices in the home aimed at preventing unintended injuries to preschool aged children.

methodsThe authors invited families with children enrolling in a medium sized Midwestern US community Head Start program to participate in a randomized study of home safety practices. Participation involved consenting parents (n = 452) completing an initial questionnaire during Head Start enrollment or in their home. Project staff conducted home inspections to confirm parental responses to 16 questions. Only inspections conducted within 34 days of questionnaire completion (n = 259) were included in the validation study. Parents were told that the home visit would assess the need for safety devices, but were not informed of the validation aspect of the study.

resultsSensitivities were generally high for all 16 safety practices, whereas negative predictive value and specificity varied considerably. Positive predictive value was also high for most practices, and did not vary by ethnicity. Answers provided by parents in their home were different and more reliable than those provided by parents interviewed at school (p = 0.001).

conclusionsUse of safety devices and practices by parents of preschool aged children reported in a face to face interview are generally reliable. Reliability increases if the interview is conducted in the home. Parents may also be more willing to report potential problems if they perceive they may receive corrective assistance.

Indexed as

Accident PreventionAccidents, HomeChild, PreschoolCultureFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleParentingParentsSafety ManagementSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesUrban HealthWisconsinWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID16461420
PMCPMC2563510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.