Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16459324›Full record

ArticleMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2006

A practical extension of hydrodynamic theory of porous transport for hydrophilic solutes.

James B Bassingthwaighte

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modeling serotonin uptake in the lung shows endothelial transporters dominate over cleft permeation.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IL-6 adsorption dynamics in hemoadsorption beads studied using confocal laser scanning microscopy.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James B BassingthwaighteUniversity of Washington, Department of Bioengineering, Seattle, Washington 98195-7962, USA. jbb@bioeng.washington.edu

Funding

3D IMAGING &COMPUTER MODEL OF THE RESPIRATORY TRACTR01HL073598 · NHLBI · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI CORLEY, RICHARD A · 2004 to 2014
$17.6M
Simulation Resource in Circulatory Mass TransportR01EB001973 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BASSINGTHWAIGHTE, JAMES B · 2003 to 2006
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL073598NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073598NIBIB NIH HHS EB01973NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe equations for transport of hydrophilic solutes through aqueous pores provide a fundamental basis for examining capillary-tissue exchange and water and solute flux through transmembrane channels, but the theory remains incomplete for ratios, alpha, of sphere diameters to pore diameters greater than 0.4. Values for permeabilities, P, and reflection coefficients, sigma, from Lewellen, working with Lightfoot et al., at alpha = 0.5 and 0.95, were combined with earlier values for alpha < 0.4, and the physically required values at alpha = 1.0, to provide accurate expressions over the whole range of 0 < alpha < 1.

methodsThe "data" were the long-accepted theory for alpha < 0.2 and the computational results from Lewellen and Lightfoot et al. on hard spheres (of 5 different alpha's) moving by convection and diffusion through a tight cylindrical pore, accounting for molecular exclusion, viscous forces, pressure drop, torque and rotation of spheres off the center line (averaging across all accessible radial positions), and the asymptotic values at alpha = 1.0. Coefficients for frictional hindrance to diffusion, F(alpha), and drag, G(alpha), and functions for sigma(alpha) and P(alpha), were represented by power law functions and the parameters optimized to give best fits to the combined "data."

resultsThe reflection coefficient sigma = {1 - [1 - (1 - phi)2]G'(alpha)} + 2alpha2 phi F'(alpha), and the relative permeability P/Pmax = phi F '(alpha)[1 + 9alpha5.5 x (1.0 - alpha5)0.02], where phi is the partition coefficient or volume fraction of the pore available to solute. The new expression for the diffusive hindrance is F'(alpha) = (1 - alpha2)(3/2) phi/[1 + 0.2 x alpha2 x (1 - alpha2)16], and for the drag factor is G'(alpha) = (1 - 2alpha(2)/3 - 0.20217 alpha5)/(1 - 0.75851 alpha5) - 0.0431[1 - (1 - alpha10)]. All of these converge monotonically to the correct limits at alpha = 1.

conclusionsThese are the first expressions providing hydrodynamically based estimates of sigma(alpha) and P(alpha) over 0 < alpha < 1 They should be accurate to within 1-2%.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAnimalsBiological TransportCapillariaCapillariesCapillary PermeabilityHumansPorosity

Identifiers

PMID16459324
PMCPMC3420965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.