Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16455888›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Validation of a multiplex pneumococcal serotyping assay with clinical samples.

Jisheng Lin, Margit S Kaltoft, Angela P Brandao, Gabriela Echaniz-Aviles, M Cristina C Brandileone, Susan K Hollingshead, William H Benjamin, Moon H Nahm

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protective responses of an engineered PspA recombinant antigen againstBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jisheng LinDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 845 19th Street South (BBRB 614), Birmingham, AL 35249-7331, USA.
Margit S Kaltoft
Angela P Brandao
Gabriela Echaniz-Aviles
M Cristina C Brandileone
Susan K Hollingshead
William H Benjamin
Moon H Nahm

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently developed a rapid pneumococcal serotyping method called "multibead assay" (J. Yu et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:156-162, 2005) based on a multiplexed immunoassay for capsular polysaccharides in lysates of pneumococcal cultures. The multibead assay can identify 36 serotypes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7A/7F, 8, 9L/9N, 9V, 10A/10B/39/33C, 11A/11D/11F, 12A/12B/12F, 14, 15B/5C, 17F, 18C, 19A, 19F, 20, 22A/22F, 23F, and 33A/33F). More than 90% of the U.S. isolates express one of these serotypes (J. B. Robbins et al., J. Infect. Dis. 148:1136-1159, 1983). To validate the new assay, we examined 495 clinical isolates of pneumococci obtained in Brazil, Denmark, and Mexico. Pneumococci were serotyped by the Neufeld test in their countries of origin, and lysates of each strain were coded and mailed to the United States for the multibead assay at ambient temperature without any thermal protection. After breaking the code, 54 discrepancies (11% of samples) were noted, but 46 were due to nonreproducible technical problems or insufficient growth of the pneumococci. All of the isolates grew well for a second test, and therefore, the culture medium used for the multibead assay is adequate. The discrepancies persisted for eight isolates, involving the 6A, 11A, and 18C serotypes. Additional studies of the eight isolates showed that the discrepancies were due to differences in the reagents used in the multibead or Neufeld tests for these three serotypes. For instance, five isolates were typed as 6A with the Neufeld test but as nontypeable by the multibead assay. Selection of another new monoclonal antibody (Hyp6AG1) for the multibead assay resulted in all five discrepant isolates typing as 6A. This finding indicates the validity of the multibead assay and emphasizes the need to validate any new pneumococcal serotyping assay with a large number of clinical isolates from different locations. It also suggests the presence of serological subtypes among isolates expressing the 6A serotype.

Indexed as

Bacterial CapsulesBacterial Typing TechniquesBrazilCulture MediaDenmarkHumansImmunoassayMexicoMicrospheresPneumococcal InfectionsSerotypingStreptococcus pneumoniaeCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID16455888
PMCPMC1364484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.