Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16455693›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2006

Modes and models of GABA(A) receptor gating.

Gareth M C Lema, Anthony Auerbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Potentiation of the GABABiophysical journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Shisa7-Dependent Regulation of GABAThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. αACS chemical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. αACS chemical neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Actions of Drug Combinations on the GABAMolecular pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gareth M C LemaCenter for Single Molecule Biophysics, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Anthony Auerbach

Funding

MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR37NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2000 to 2013
$6.9M
Multiple Activity Patterns of Acetylcholine ReceptorsR56NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2014 to 2014
$530k
MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR01NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 1987 to 1999
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS 23513NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023513NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS023513NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS023513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon activation by agonist, the type A gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABAR) 'gates', allowing chloride ions to permeate membranes and produce fast inhibition of neurons. There is no consensus kinetic model for the GABAR gating mechanism. We expressed human alpha(1)beta(1)gamma(2S) GABARs in HEK 293 cells and recorded single channel currents in the cell-attached configuration using various GABA concentrations (50-5000 microm). Closed and open events occurred individually and in clusters that had at least three different modes that were distinguishable by open probability (P(O)): High (P(O)= 0.73), Mid (P(O)= 0.50), and Low (P(O)= 0.21). We used a critical time to isolate shorter bursts of openings and to thus eliminate long-lived, desensitized events. Bursts from all three modes contained three closed and three open components. We employed maximum likelihood fitting, autocorrelation analysis and macroscopic current simulation to distinguish kinetic schemes. The 'core' gating scheme for most models contained two closed states that preceded an open state (C(1) C(2) O(1)). The two best-fitting models had a third closed state connected to C(1) and a second open state (O(2)) connected to C(2). The third open state, whose occupancy varied greatly between modes, could be connected either to O(2) or C(2). We estimated rate constants for two identical, independent GABA binding steps by globally fitting data across GABA concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 microm. For the most highly ranked model the binding rate constants were: k(+)= 3 microm(-1) s(-1) and k(-)= 272 s(-1) (K(D)= 91 microm).

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsCell LineComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, Druggamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansIon Channel GatingKidneyMembrane PotentialsNeural InhibitionReceptors, GABA-Agamma-Aminobutyric AcidReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID16455693
PMCPMC1779655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.