Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16454536›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2006

The prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in patients with heart failure at hospital discharge.

Bernhard Straubhaar, Stephan Krähenbühl, Raymond G Schlienger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug-drug interaction software in clinical practice: a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Drug-drug interactions in inpatient and outpatient settings in Iran: a systematic review of the literature.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Potential Drug Interactions with AiDKlinikIntegrated pharmacy research & practice · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Prospective Analysis of Drug Interactions in Patients of Intensive Cardiac Care Unit.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Psychocardiology in the elderly.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bernhard StraubhaarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stephan Krähenbühl
Raymond G Schlienger
University of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivePharmacotherapy for heart failure is complex and, due to polypharmacy, is associated with a large risk of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The objective of the present study was to assess the prevalence of potential DDIs in the medication of hospitalised heart failure patients and to evaluate their clinical relevance. STUDY DESIGN/

methodsThe medication of 400 patients was retrospectively analysed for potential DDIs at hospital admission and discharge using a computerised drug interaction program. Main inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of heart failure and a minimum of two drug prescriptions at discharge.

resultsIn the study population of 400 heart failure patients (median age 79 years, 55.5% men), the median number of drugs per patient was lower at admission than at discharge (6 [interquartile range {IQR} 4-9] vs 8 [IQR 6-10]; p < 0.001). At hospital admission, a total of 863 potential DDIs were detected in 272 patients (68.0%; 95% CI 63.4, 72.6). At discharge, 1171 potential DDIs were detected in 355 patients (88.8%; 95% CI 85.7, 91.8). This corresponds with a significant increase in the median number of potential DDIs per patient from admission to discharge (1.5 [IQR 0-3] vs 3 [IQR 1-4]; p < 0.001). Of the 1171 potential DDIs at discharge, 432 (36.9%) were prevalent at admission and 739 (63.1%) resulted from a medication change during the hospital stay. Of these 739 new potential DDIs, the severity of the potential adverse effect was rated as 'major' in 190 (25.7%) patients, 'moderate' in 482 (65.2%) and 'minor' in 67 (9.1%). The 190 potential DDIs with major severity were recorded in a total of 145 patients (36.3%; 95% CI 31.5, 41.0%). Hyperkalaemia was the most prevalent potential adverse effect of major severity (n = 93) and the combination of an ACE inhibitor with a potassium-sparing diuretic was recorded in 64 (16.0%) patients.

conclusionsThe study shows that hospitalisation of patients with heart failure results in an increase in the number of drugs prescribed per patient and, thereby, also in the number of potentially interacting drug combinations per patient. Although electronic drug interaction programs are a valuable tool to check for potential DDIs, the clinical relevance of most potential DDIs can only be judged by assessment of the individual patient.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsPolypharmacyAgedCardiovascular AgentsComorbidityFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesCardiovascular Agents

Identifiers

PMID16454536
OpenAlexW1964878544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.