Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16454384›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2005

Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Raúl C Mainar-Jaime, Pilar M Muñoz, María J de Miguel, María J Grilló, Clara M Marín, Ignacio Moriyón, José M Blasco

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA Sensor for the Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Serological and molecular prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raúl C Mainar-JaimeDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4. raul.mainar@usask.ca
Pilar M Muñoz
María J de Miguel
María J Grilló
Clara M Marín
Ignacio Moriyón
José M Blasco
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When brucellosis false positive serological reactions happen in cattle, the serial use of pairs of specificity-correlated serological tests (rose bengal, complement fixation, competitive ELISA) results in specificities lower than expected. In this situation, highly specific tests, such as the indirect ELISA used alone, may be more adequate than serial testing.

Indexed as

Agglutination TestsAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBrucellaBrucellosis, BovineCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFalse Positive ReactionsReproducibility of ResultsRose BengalSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsYersinia enterocoliticaAntigens, BacterialRose Bengal

Identifiers

PMID16454384
PMCPMC1255594
OpenAlexW1547950362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.